Auraflow underwent rigorous training over four weeks to fine-tune its capabilities, achieving impressive scores during tests. Although it is still in its beta phase, meaning that it requires considerable computing power, FAL AI is already working on a more manageable version that could run on consumer-grade GPUs. In tests comparing Auraflow to SD3 in various art styles and prompts, both models showed strengths and weaknesses. For example, while Auraflow excelled at creating impressionistic and fantastical styles, SD3 was better at delivering detailed and hyper-realistic images.
The hardware requirements present a notable challenge for Auraflow. It demands a powerful GPU with a significant amount of VRAM, compared to SD3’s lower needs. This discrepancy makes SD3 accessible to a broader audience, especially those working with budget-friendly hardware. Despite this, Auraflow shows great potential, and if the development team can release a more efficient version in the future, it may become a worthy competitor capable of challenging Stability AI’s dominance in the AI image generation space.
Article Source